It is a fact of life that, not uncommonly, people get injured or killed while physically on real estate that does not belong to them. The legal question necessarily arises whether the real estate owner is liable for such an injury or death on his or her property. The answer is that it depends upon which state's law applies and upon the individual circumstances. In some states, the legal status of the injured person vis-à-vis the particular property is relevant.
In feudal England, complex law evolved surrounding property ownership and use, as your legal relationship to the land reflected your rights and social status. Traditional visitors' status fell basically into these categories:
Many US states still recognize these legal distinctions and require landowners to fulfill these varying duties to visitors depending up their legal status. For example, an owner would owe a higher duty to keep the real estate reasonably safe for an invitee, but for a trespasser, the owner only has to be sure not to act willfully or wantonly.
Some states have lumped invitees and licensees into the same category since their entry onto the property is more foreseeable, but those states still retain the separate status of wrongful trespassers. Most states treat social guests like licensees, but sometimes like invitees.
Several states have adopted a modern, more flexible approach that extinguishes the distinction between the three categories of visitors. These states impose a general duty of care on the landowner to maintain reasonably safe premises under the particular circumstances for all visitors. These jurisdictions focus on the foreseeability of injury and the reasonableness of the owner's property maintenance, rather than on the legal status of the visitor.
In the situation where a trespassing child is injured, the principle of attractive nuisance has been recognized by almost all the states. This doctrine recognizes the reduced capacity of a young person to ascertain danger, making a landowner liable for harm to a trespassing minor injured by an artificially created condition, but not by a natural feature of the land, where:
Some states also require that the owner exercise reasonable care to remove the danger.
In states that have not adopted the doctrine of attractive nuisance, some type of standard is usually applied that considers reasonable care under the circumstances or foreseeability of harm.
This article is a broad summary of the basic principles of landowner liability. The situation can get even more complex if the premises on which a third party is injured are leased by the owner to another. An attorney knowledgeable about the details of premises liability law in your jurisdiction can advise you as a landowner or leaseholder, or if you or your loved one is injured on land belonging to another.
To read and print out a copy of the checklist, please follow the link below.
Your First Appointment With a Real Estate Attorney
You can download a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader here.
Copyright © 2008 FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business
DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent counsel for advice on any legal matter.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Copyright © 2010 by Yewell Law, LLC. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.